Buy This Book

 

All Ebook Formats $0.00 ISBN: 9781610914178

RELATED BOOKS

  •  Vital Signs 2013
    Vital Signs 2013 The Worldwatch Institute
  •  State of the World 2013
    State of the World 2013 The Worldwatch Institute
  •  Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerabilities
    Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerabilities Virginia Burkett
  •  Climate Change and Pacific Islands: Indicators and Impacts
    Climate Change and Pacific Islands: Indicators and Impacts Victoria Keener
  •  Planning for Post-Disaster Recovery
    Planning for Post-Disaster Recovery Gavin Smith

Global Warming, Politics, and the Media

 Global Warming, Politics, and the Media
Bookmark and Share

David Roberts

21 pages

On September 21, 2011, David Roberts participated in The National Climate Seminar, a series of webinars sponsored by Bard College’s Center for Environmental Policy. The online seminars provide a forum for leading scientists, writers, and other experts to talk about critical issues regarding climate change. The series also opens a public conversation, inviting participants to ask questions and contribute their own thoughts.

Roberts is a Senior Staff Writer at Grist, one of the web’s most popular sites for environmental news and commentary, so he is distinctively qualified to discuss the relationship between global warming, politics, and the media. In his lecture, Roberts argued that environmentalists’ traditional criticism of climate change coverage—namely that journalists describe global warming as a debatable theory rather than as fact—is no longer the issue. Most media accept the reality of climate change—but it is treated as a specialty issue, rather than as a phenomenon that affects myriad aspects of life. The seminar focused on how to change that perception—how to make climate a backdrop to the political debates that affect real change.

This E-ssential is an edited version of Roberts’ talk and the subsequent question and answer session. While some material has been cut and some language modified for clarity, the intention was to retain the substance of the original discussion. 

 

Google preview here